Teacher Observation Project
The Virginia Teacher Feedback and Guidance Project
The process and tools were developed and piloted by the Virginia Adult
Learning Resource Center. It is based on research by Saphier* and others
that indicates that narrative reports based on observers' notes are more
likely to lead to improved teaching than the checklist approach. Notes and
narrative reports provide a detailed, chronological record of what was
observed, show how events and activities relate to each other, allow the
observer to give the teacher specific feedback -- both positive and
negative--and provide evidence for any claims the observer makes.
The observation process is carried out in steps:
- The observer contacts the teacher to set up a time for the
observation, to get basic information about the class, and to identify
the teacher's goals for the observation.
- The observer visits the teacher's class for 1-2 hours and takes
detailed notes about what is observed.
- The observer analyzes the observation using a Teaching
Analysis Form structured around a set of Indicators
of Good Teaching in Adult Education developed by the project advisory
group.
- The observer meets with the teacher to discuss the observation.
- The teacher may then make changes to her/his practice based on the
insights gained from the observation.
The Procedures for Observers
summarizes the process.
Programs or regions using this process will probably want to introduce the
process and share and discuss the Indicators
of Good Teaching during teacher orientation and as part of ongoing
staff development. In that way, the observation becomes routine and the
Indicators of Good Teaching
are a tool and guidepost for teachers in the program.
While observation is often associated with evaluation, this process is
designed to help teachers examine and improve their classroom practice. It
should be clearly distinct from any observation for evaluation that a
program might use. The only documents from this observation process
that should be filed are the Letter
to the Teacher, the Request
for Background Information and the Post-Observation
Teacher Follow-up Plan.
* Saphier, John. (1993). How to make supervision and evaluation
really work. Acton, MA: Research for Better Teaching, Inc.
|